The best Side of case law de listed plot from abandoned proerty supreme court
The best Side of case law de listed plot from abandoned proerty supreme court
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice on the legal rights with the parties, arising out with the over marriage from the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Case regulation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
In case the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according on the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The loads of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-industry duties from the interim period. Read more
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these kinds of an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
For the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A just isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling somebody to inform them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these types of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is probably going being more frustrating than it’s value.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for your department to act has case laws pakistan already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a negative link or a portion of an opinion lacking), please notify the eService Heart.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.